CLBR / Colombier Acquisition Corp. III - 認沽/認購比率, 期權情緒,異常期權活動

哥倫布比爾收購公司 III
US ˙ NYSE ˙ US19533H2076

認沽/認購比率 - 預測與歷史

認沽/認購比率認沽期權的成交量除以認購期權的成交量。由於認沽期權通常表示看跌,而認購期權表示看漲,認沽/認購比率大於1表示看跌情緒,比率小於1表示看漲情緒。

See companies with the most optimistic put/call ratios.

Put/Call Ratio by Expiration

The put/call ratio by expiration chart shows how options positioning differs across upcoming expiration dates. It compares put open interest to call open interest for each expiration, helping identify whether traders are more heavily positioned for downside protection, downside speculation, or upside participation at specific points in time. This can be especially useful around major catalysts such as earnings, product announcements, regulatory events, macro data releases, or large option expiration dates, where positioning may cluster in certain maturities.

A ratio above 1.0 means there is more put open interest than call open interest for that expiration, which may indicate more bearish, defensive, or hedging-oriented positioning. A ratio below 1.0 means call open interest is greater than put open interest, which may suggest more bullish or speculative upside positioning. Large spikes in a single expiration can signal that market attention is concentrated around that date, but the ratio should not be interpreted as a standalone prediction of price direction. It is best read alongside stock price trends, total open interest, option volume, implied volatility, and known upcoming catalysts.

到期日 DTX 認沽
持倉量
認購
持倉量
認沽/認購
比率
來源:芝加哥期權交易所(CBOE)
Put/Call Ratio and Out-of-the-Money Put/Call Ratio Over Time

The put/call ratio compares the amount of put option open interest to call option open interest. A put option generally benefits when the stock price falls, while a call option generally benefits when the stock price rises. When the put/call ratio is above 1.0, there is more put open interest than call open interest, which may suggest a more bearish or defensive options posture. When the ratio is below 1.0, call open interest is greater than put open interest, which may suggest more bullish or upside-oriented positioning.

The out-of-the-money put/call ratio is a more focused version of the same concept. Instead of comparing all puts to all calls, it compares only out-of-the-money puts with out-of-the-money calls. Out-of-the-money options are contracts whose strike prices are away from the current stock price: puts below the current price and calls above the current price. Because these options often reflect directional speculation, hedging demand, or expectations for a larger future move, the out-of-the-money ratio can provide a more sensitive view of sentiment at the edges of the option chain.

The main difference between the two metrics is scope. The overall put/call ratio includes all open interest, including in-the-money, at-the-money, and out-of-the-money contracts. This makes it a broad measure of options positioning, but it can be influenced by older positions, hedges, spreads, or contracts that are already deep in the money. The out-of-the-money put/call ratio filters the view to contracts that may better represent current expectations for downside protection or upside speculation.

Traders can use these ratios as sentiment and positioning indicators. A rising put/call ratio may suggest increasing caution, hedging, or bearish speculation, while a falling ratio may suggest improving risk appetite or greater call-side interest. However, high put activity is not always bearish: it can also reflect protective hedging by investors who remain long the stock. Similarly, heavy call activity may be bullish speculation, but it can also be part of covered calls, spreads, or other non-directional strategies.

These metrics are most useful when viewed over time rather than as single-day readings. Sudden spikes, sustained trends, or divergences between the overall ratio and the out-of-the-money ratio can highlight changes in market expectations. For example, if the overall put/call ratio is stable but the out-of-the-money ratio rises sharply, traders may be adding tail-risk protection without broadly changing their existing options exposure. As with any options indicator, these ratios should be interpreted alongside price action, volume, implied volatility, upcoming earnings or catalysts, and broader market conditions.

日期 認沽持倉量 認沽持倉量
(價外)
認購持倉量 認購持倉量
(價外)
認沽/認購
比率
認沽/認購
比率 (價外)
2025-07-15 62,192 54,106
2025-07-14 57,708 50,593
2025-07-11 52,676 46,852
2025-07-10 45,413 33,287
2025-07-09 41,658 31,059
2025-07-08 40,259 30,980
2025-07-07 36,807 28,966
2025-07-03 35,028 27,389
2025-07-02 34,431 27,253
2025-07-01 34,117 27,042
來源:芝加哥期權交易所(CBOE)
異常期權活動 - 交易量

認沽/認購比率認沽期權的成交量除以認購期權的成交量。由於認沽期權通常表示看跌,而認購期權表示看漲,認沽/認購比率大於1表示看跌情緒,比率小於1表示看漲情緒。

異常期權活動(UOA)通常被視為對於價格走勢方向的強烈信號。其中一個異常期權活動的衡量指標是,認購或認沽期權的總成交量除以相同類型期權的持倉量。如果認購或認沽期權的總成交量超過當前的持倉量,那就被視為異常,並指示出強烈的走勢信號。在下表中,任何一個期權成交量超過當前持倉量的日期將以綠色(用於認購期權)或紅色(用於認沽期權)突出顯示。

例如,如果在任何交易日中,認購成交量超過當前的認購期權持倉量,則 認購成交量/認購持倉量比率將大於一,並且該表中的該單元格將以綠色突出顯示。這表示存在大量的認購期權買盤,這是一個看漲的信號。同樣地,如果相反情況成立,即認沽成交量超過認沽期權持倉量,則該表格單元格將以紅色突出顯示,代表著一個強烈的看跌信號。

更新頻率:每日

日期 認沽
成交量
認沽
持倉量
認沽成交量
/認沽持倉量
認購
成交量
認購
持倉量
認購成交量
/認購持倉量
2025-07-15 15,275 62,192 41,697 98,136
2025-07-14 8,669 57,708 14,541 96,600
2025-07-11 9,645 52,676 24,064 93,377
2025-07-10 9,590 45,413 13,879 90,197
2025-07-09 4,898 41,658 13,349 88,086
2025-07-08 5,437 40,259 11,637 85,207
2025-07-07 5,309 36,807 27,644 79,560
2025-07-03 2,727 35,028 11,520 77,044
2025-07-02 992 34,431 4,459 75,858
2025-07-01 662 34,117 4,160 74,452
2025-06-30 1,921 33,338 12,227 72,158
2025-06-27 952 32,758 11,512 66,384
2025-06-26 2,623 31,830 9,506 61,287
2025-06-25 7,296 29,382 12,331 61,212
2025-06-24 701 29,288 8,143 58,386
2025-06-23 4,361 27,379 14,976 52,182
2025-06-20 5,981 39,924 14,005 76,762
2025-06-18 4,291 37,001 6,287 75,546
2025-06-17 2,060 35,884 10,478 75,164
2025-06-16 1,958 34,827 6,284 73,506
2025-06-13 1,309 34,259 3,915 73,159
2025-06-12 839 34,154 3,981 72,643
2025-06-11 632 33,921 3,873 72,749
2025-06-10 868 33,800 4,241 73,822
2025-06-09 1,174 33,134 4,579 74,334
來源:芝加哥期權交易所(CBOE)
買入/賣出的期權金 - 整體市場

Options premium data shows the dollar value of activity in the options market, not just the number of contracts traded. This makes it useful because premium reflects how much capital traders are committing to calls and puts. Heavy call premium bought may suggest demand for upside exposure, while heavy put premium bought may indicate downside speculation or protective hedging. Premium sold can also be informative, as it may reflect income generation, volatility selling, covered-call activity, or willingness to take on downside risk through put selling.

For trading, options premium data can help identify shifts in sentiment and conviction. Traders can compare net call premium and net put premium to see whether flow is leaning bullish, bearish, or defensive, and can watch for sudden spikes that may signal unusual positioning ahead of earnings, news, or other catalysts. It is most useful when viewed over time and combined with stock price action, volume, open interest, implied volatility, and upcoming events, since premium flow alone does not reveal the full strategy behind each trade.

更新頻率:每日

日期 認沽期權
買入價
認沽期權
賣出價
淨認沽期權t
買入價
認購期權
買入價
認購期權
賣出價
淨認購期權t
買入價
淨長倉
買入價
2025-07-15 558,530 582,516 -23,986 3,037,190 2,732,240 304,950 328,936
2025-07-14
2025-07-11
2025-07-10
2025-07-09
2025-07-08
2025-07-07
2025-07-03
2025-07-02
2025-07-01
2025-06-30
2025-06-27
2025-06-26
2025-06-25
2025-06-24
2025-06-23
2025-06-20
2025-06-18
2025-06-17
2025-06-16
來源:芝加哥期權交易所(CBOE)
期權交易量 - 整體市場

更新頻率:每日

日期 認沽
成交量
認沽期權成交量
(20日均綫)
認沽期權
成交量/20日均綫(%)
認購
成交量
認購期權成交量
(20日均綫)
認購期權
成交量/20日均綫(%)
總成交量 認沽/認購
成交量比率
認沽/認購
成交量比率(20日均綫)
2025-07-15 15,275 3,766 405.60 41,697 11,035 377.86 56,972 0.37 0.34
2025-07-14
2025-07-11
2025-07-10
2025-07-09
2025-07-08
2025-07-07
2025-07-03
2025-07-02
2025-07-01
2025-06-30
2025-06-27
2025-06-26
2025-06-25
2025-06-24
2025-06-23
2025-06-20
2025-06-18
2025-06-17
2025-06-16
來源:芝加哥期權交易所(CBOE)
期權交易量 - 場内

更新頻率:每日

日期 CBOE C2 EDGX BZX PHLX NASDAQ BX GEMX ISE MRX AMEX ARCA MIAX PEARL EMLD BOX 合計
2025-07-15 4,860 504 1,650 2,170 8,136 918 602 256 10,250 285 4,686 2,208 3,843 636 407 11,361 56,972
2025-07-14 2,061 1,112 928 1,075 4,151 289 268 194 4,282 244 2,546 591 814 277 212 1,799 23,210
2025-07-11 3,265 362 844 887 5,383 613 842 115 6,235 455 5,942 791 1,413 328 428 3,335 33,709
2025-07-10 1,654 388 1,927 603 2,657 579 211 146 3,680 304 4,607 176 739 183 134 4,290 23,469
2025-07-09 1,888 945 956 384 3,673 351 260 452 1,755 916 2,045 444 651 253 310 1,655 18,247
2025-07-08 588 316 496 1,162 2,241 200 345 86 1,922 142 5,052 204 791 203 157 1,507 17,074
2025-07-07 2,384 593 1,096 1,350 4,901 1,204 979 236 5,849 1,287 3,280 479 1,870 275 295 2,640 32,953
2025-07-03 942 801 684 593 2,338 335 448 33 3,495 294 943 303 311 93 564 1,069 14,247
2025-07-02 192 108 209 382 950 386 63 23 847 134 582 85 186 64 23 455 5,451
2025-07-01 270 32 206 124 739 413 242 33 1,125 59 355 180 196 26 16 320 4,822
2025-06-30 1,078 439 614 506 2,016 145 249 70 3,516 151 658 290 1,038 177 207 789 14,148
2025-06-27 944 345 412 723 2,075 298 385 70 2,237 75 594 482 864 134 152 1,041 12,464
2025-06-26 939 359 433 377 2,479 522 783 25 2,150 159 761 965 716 168 60 946 12,129
2025-06-25 1,371 612 720 636 3,547 186 607 133 3,601 143 2,339 2,671 616 145 142 1,870 19,627
2025-06-24 767 441 429 217 960 168 519 54 2,097 48 248 682 1,111 70 22 951 8,844
2025-06-23 1,027 1,169 373 682 3,771 241 1,606 66 5,261 264 880 1,209 674 135 321 1,198 19,337
2025-06-20 2,524 713 503 332 2,858 821 2,050 144 4,035 242 729 1,259 1,127 136 197 2,014 19,986
2025-06-18 1,486 359 718 410 2,047 213 584 55 1,933 14 1,247 225 374 143 129 529 10,578
2025-06-17 875 258 288 392 2,094 687 951 15 2,660 177 586 522 829 60 48 1,886 12,538
2025-06-16 543 146 206 244 1,430 210 778 46 1,536 310 425 721 346 84 190 844 8,242
來源:芝加哥期權交易所(CBOE)
How Much do you Like Fintel?
Please share your opinion of our service!
Excellent Bad
Fintel data has been cited in the following publications:
Daily Mail Fox Business Business Insider Wall Street Journal The Washington Post Bloomberg Financial Times Globe and Mail
NASDAQ.com Reuters The Guardian Associated Press FactCheck.org Snopes Politifact
Federal Register The Intercept Forbes Fortune Magazine TheStreet Time Magazine Canadian Broadcasting Corporation International Business Times
Cambridge University Press Investopedia MarketWatch NY Daily News Entrepreneur Newsweek Barron's El Economista